|
|
|
|
|
Mini Tracks – Calls for Papers & Workshops
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measuring Intangibles &
Intellectual Capital
Knowledge Retention
Knowledge
through collaboration
Dynamics
of Temporary Coalitions
Knowledge Management in Higher Education
KM as a
managerial tool in EU research programs
Human
Capital for Outstanding Results
Linking
KM and IC to economic growth of countries
|

|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Mini-Track on Measuring
Intangibles and Intellectual Capital 
Chair: Bernard
Marr
The Advanced Performance Institute, UK www.ap-institute.com
The struggle to measure and asses intangibles is
the number one challenge the research community is facing today. Many argue
that without measures we can know nothing and understand nothing. Without
measures we can’t do any research, organisations can’t manage
their intangibles and they can’t produce meaningful IC statements.
However, when it comes to measurement we are facing a real dilemma: we can’t
really measure our intangibles in the same way we can measure tangible
aspects of performance. When it comes to intangibles we have to rely on proxy
measures. This in turn has important implications of how we can use those
measures.
Key questions arising from this include:
- Can we actually measure
intangibles? And if so, how would be do this? Do we use quantitative
methods, qualitative methods or a mix of both? Do we need to
differentiate between terms such as measurement, assessment and
evaluation?
- What are the implications of
the limited measurability on research, management, compensation and
reporting?
- Are tools such as Balanced
Scorecards, Strategy Maps and IC Reports appropriate for today’s
information needs?
Papers addressing
these important issues are invited to submit to this track. For a further
discussion of these topics see also: Marr,
B. (2005) Perspectives on Intellectual Capital: Multidisciplinary Insights
into Management, Measurement and Reporting, Elsevier, Boston and Marr, B. (2006) Strategic Performance
Management: Leveraging and Measuring your Intangible Value Drivers,
Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
For details about how to submit papers to this
mini track, please see the call
for papers page.
|

Bernard Marr
|
|
Mini-Track on Knowledge Retention
in a Knowledge based Economy

Chair: Thurasamy Ramayah
School
of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia www.ramayah.com.
In the current knowledge economy, one of the major issues faced by a
knowledge-based organization is the large knowledge gap among the hierarchy
of experts. It was aptly put by Edenius and Borgerson (2003) as follows:
“We are said to
live in a knowledge economy where value stems from professional workers and
how they are organized and less from physical products (Drucker, 1973; Bell,
1974; Nelson & Winter, 1982). Identification, generation, transfer,
storage and efficient integration of knowledge preoccupy today’s
corporate managers (Stewart, 1997; Davenport & Prusak, 1998; Cross &
Baird, 2000).”
High turnover rate in organizations where key individuals leave
has posed a major threat in knowledge drain which in turn impairs the
competitive advantage of the organization. In short, it is expensive to lose good
employees (Gunnlaugsdottir, 2004). A survey by KPMG Peat Marwick (1998)
conducted among European companies found that “almost half of the
companies reported having suffered a significant setback from losing key
staff with 43% experiencing impaired client or supplier relations and 13%
facing a loss of income because of the departure of a single employee”
(Alavi & Leidner 2001). Therefore, the ability
to retain knowledge in an organization has become increasingly important.
Numerous studies have looked into knowledge management, but few
have focused on knowledge retention per se. Knowledge retention deals with
ways to capture knowledge “before it walks out the door” and
avoid “reinventing the wheel.” It can also be referred to as all
activities that preserve knowledge and allow it to remain in the system once
introduced and this includes those activities that maintain the viability of
knowledge within the system (Newman & Conrad, 2000).
Why is there a need to focus on knowledge retention you
may ask? There has been a reduction in the amount of time employees are given to
acquire new knowledge and there is greater mobility in the workforce leading
to knowledge loss. The aging population and a shrinking pool of young
professionals have become a common problem in both developing and developed
countries. Thus, there is a renewed interest in the way in which knowledge
can be captured, shared and retained to improve performance and competitive
advantage.
This mini track invites papers that explore this
subject and topics may include:
- Knowledge retention needs in an organization
- Recent developments in knowledge retention
- Knowledge loss and the knowledge economy
- The impact of knowledge loss on the company and economy
- Methods of retaining existing knowledge
- The role of training to retain knowledge
- What kinds of knowledge are transferable?
- The role of human resource policies in knowledge retention
- Tools available to capture and retain knowledge
- Critical implementation issues in knowledge retention
- Best practice in knowledge retention
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge
management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), pp. 107-136.
Bell, D. (1974). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social
Forecasting. London:
Heinemann.
Cross, R., &
Baird, L. (2000).. Sloan Management
Review, 41(3), pp.69-78.
Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge. Boston,
MA: Harvard Business
School Press,.
Technology is not enough: improving performance by building organizational
memory
Drucker, P. (1973).
Management. NY: Harper & Row.
Edenius, M., & Borgerson, J. (2003). To manage knowledge by intranet. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(5),
pp. 124-136.
Gunnlaugsdottir, J.
(2004). Using and preserving corporate knowledge during times of change. 12th Nordic Conference on Information and
Documentation, Aalborg, Denmark, September 1 – 3,
pp. 121-129.
KPMG Management
Consulting (1998). Knowledge Management:
Research Report, 1998.
Nelson, R., &
Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary
Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Newman, B. D., &
Conrad, K. W. (2000). A framework for characterizing knowledge management
methods, practices, and technologies, in Reimer, U. (Eds), Practical
Aspects of Knowledge Management Proceedings of the Third International
Conference, Basel, Switzerland, October 30-31, pp.16.1-11.
Stewart, T. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of
Nations. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.
For details about how to submit papers to this
mini track, please see the call
for papers page.
|

Thurasamy Ramayah
|
|
Mini-Track on How to acquire knowledge
through collaboration? From individual to inter organisational learning
process 
Co-Chairs: Adnan Maalaoui
Institut
d’Administartion des Entreprise (IAE) - Toulon University- France
Malek Bourguiba
CEREFIGE Laboratory-Nancy
University- France
Amine Chelly
Ecole
des Dirigeants et Créateurs d’entreprise (EDC) Paris, France
Knowledge
represents an important resource in firm’s management (Dewulf et al
2005, Spender, 1996, 2006a, 2006b) which improves competitive advantage.
Nevertheless, knowledge acquisition requires complex and ambiguous processes
especially in specific contexts such as collaboration. Our review of the
strategic alliances literature begins with the Garette and Dussauge (1995) as
well as Hamel (1991) writings about the knowledge transfer process in
strategic alliances. Since then, many researchers have been interested in
this topic. Several authors confirmed the competitive nature of knowledge
transfer (Nonaka 1994; Hamel 1991; Prahalad, Hamel & Doz 1999; Lyles
1988; Pucik, 1988; Kogut 1989, Inckpen 1998, 2000, 2002; Simonin 1993,1999,
Grant, 1996, 2004;). But, it seems that none have treated all of the problems
encountered by a firm when processing knowledge transfer (at least in the
same research). In this session, we hope to explain these problems and to
highlight knowledge learning factors (Kale et al 2000; Lyer 2002; Hitt et al
2000; Oliver 2001; Osborn et al 1997; Liebeskind et al 1996; Muthusamy and
White 2005; Anand and Khanna 2000; Eisenhardt and Martin 2000).
This
session aims to clarify the link between:
§
Individual learning and
inter-organizational learning
§
Knowledge evolution throughout
this process
§
How it can allow companies to
build a competitive advantage.
Papers are
invited on the following topics:
§
Evaluation and transfer of
knowledge in a collaborative context
§
Impact of routines, nature of
collaboration, learning capacity, opportunism, numbers of players,
§
Acquisition of knowledge and
performance in alliances
§
Knowledge transfer in
organisational networks
§
For details about how to submit papers to this
mini track, please see the call
for papers page.
|

Adnan Maalaoui

Malek Bourguiba
|
|
Mini-Track on The Dynamics of Temporary
Coalitions and Collective Knowledge 
Co-Chairs: Michael Taylor
University of Birmingham, UK
Sandra Begley
University
of Birmingham, UK
John Bryson
University of Birmingham, UK
The role of knowledge
and the primary assumption of the theory of the growth of the firm is that
growth is an evolutionary process based on the cumulative growth of
‘collective knowledge' (Penrose, 1995: Xiii). Successful enterprises
are those who understand knowledge centred competitive advantage, based on
collective knowledge. They explore the best ways to manage
uncertainties by using temporary coalitions of people and firms that provide
the mix of knowledge, skills, experience and competencies, and create
contexts, when and where they are required to generate growth, renewal capabilities
and innovation (Taylor, 2006). The ability to be experimental,
innovative and flexible appears to be a key factor, along with formal and
informal networks for long term firm survival.
This
mini-track welcomes original, high quality scholarly and professional
submissions which contribute to the absence of theoretical and empirical work
between the firm, renewal, territorial transformation (Taylor 2005; Fields
2006) and knowledge (intellectual and social capital), particularly the
emergent properties that are a result of the disengagement and re-engagement
of organisational linkages over time, the temporal changes in business
activity and the adaptive and dynamic capabilities of the firm, as a critical
factor in underpinning growth and renewal. This track also encourages
multi/inter-disciplinary approaches to the subject.
Submissions would typically explore:
- the sharing
and exchanging of knowledge in formal and informal networks,
coalitions and communities of practice that facilitate firm survival
and innovation;
- firm
survival, temporary coalitions and collective knowledge;
- the nature
of the collective agency that strategic coalitions create, exercise and
dissolve;
- social
processes within, between and surrounding firms;
- the
characteristics and determinants of relational patterns, causal
relationships, path dependencies and the relations of power and control;
- the use of
business ethnographies to explore how relationships and coalitions in
firms, evolve and re-configure in and over time; and
- the
development of micro-cluster strategies to enable innovation and
knowledge transfer.
For details about how to submit papers to this
mini track, please see the call
for papers page.
|

Michael Taylor

Sandra Begley

John Bryson
|
|
Mini-Track on Knowledge Management in
Higher Education 
Co-Chairs: Aswatha Kumar M
M.S.Ramaiah Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India
Satyadhyan R. Chickerur
M.S.Ramaiah
Institute of Technology, Bangalore,
India
Knowledge in this
century flows seamlessly across Internet, computers, students, faculty, organizations
as well as across
space and time.
This mini track focuses on how KM and its allied entities can be used to
improve quality of higher
education.
Technical, economical, Behavioral, organizational effects, pros cons of the
use of KM in the field of higher
education will be
examined.
Potential topics
that this session will address are:
§
Use of Knowledge management on
Higher education.
§
Technical challenges and
solutions in the development and implementation of systems that facilitate
knowledge flows in Higher education.
§
Use of Open source tools in
such endeavors.
§
Capturing knowledge abundantly
available in universities using various tools like Content management
systems, learning management systems etc.
§
Effectively using KM for better
teaching learning process.
§
Organizational changes for
using information technology for KM.
§
Effectively using blogs , wikis
for knowledge reuse
For
details about how to submit papers to this mini track, please see the call
for papers page
|

Aswatha Kumar M

Satyadhyan R. Chickerur
|
|
Mini-Track on Knowledge Management as a managerial tool
in EU research programs 
Chair: Milly Perry
The
Open University, Raanana,
Israel
"Helping
Europe to lead the knowledge revolution" (2/2007), are words of the
European Commission's president, strongly suggesting that the European
commission and council recognize Knowledge as a critical component in Europe's future.
Most of the commission's white and green papers regarding ERA and Framework
Program as well as strategic papers ("Putting knowledge into
practice" 9/2006 or "Lead market initiative for Europe"
10/2007) and many other research projects targeted to reinforce KM tools,
culture and technologies for research and business Europe-wide, reinforce
this attitude. However, the commission's communications about its own
governance contain many eclectic ideas rather than a systematic management
method. In view of all this, the inevitable question would be: why doesn't
the commission walk the talk and use KM methods they recommend for Europe's organizations?
Knowledge management within the framework of the EU presents a real
challenge. While in recent years the remarkable European endeavor in research
and development has made use of the terminology of Knowledge management
(Knowledge society, change process, organizational culture, information
sharing, best practices as well as large-scale sharing technologies,
accumulation and dissemination of information), in actual fact it has not yet
made use of the Knowledge management tool as its quintessential management
strategy.
Evidence from research, funded research managers alongside project managers
from the EU and other stakeholders and policy makers are vital in order to
explore this paradox of not using managerial strategies in the complex
multi-task management of the EU except sporadically and in low profile.
Papers are invited which deal with issues such as:
- Clear evidence for targets,
objectives and vision setting.
- Knowledge sharing processes
and sharing-culture nurturing within research framework and between
projects.
- Maintaining outside
influence, change management and innovation culture and tools.
- Consolidation of transparent
infrastructures.
- Setting up organizational learning
structures and procedures.
- Formalizing communities of
practice and expert networks regarding varied stockholders groups within
Europe and worldwide.
- Materializing managerial
tools for evaluation and measurement of policy actions and outcome.
- Facilitative technologies for
enhancing such processes.
For
details about how to submit papers to this mini track, please see the call
for papers page
|

Milly Perry
|
|
|
Mini track on Human Capital for
Outstanding Results 
Chair:
Maria do
Rosario Cabrita, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal
A firm’s success is always the result of both well formulated and well
implemented strategies (Grant, 1998). Strategy formulation and execution is always
a human task. It is in the hands of the top management team (TMT) and the
firm’s most important technicians and managers – its key
professional people (KPP) (Viedma, 2003). Thus, selective Human Resources are
the key drivers of firm success, but in the knowledge economy the constant
need of innovation and strategy renewal extends the importance of selective
HR to the whole HR of the firm. This is particularly true in the so called
knowledge intensive companies.
At the same time, in the knowledge economy context, the relationship between
individual employees and their employing organisation is undergoing
fundamental changes. Increasingly, the employee is less a malleable resource
for the company and more a mobile investor of his or her Human Capital.
The term Human Capital refers to the employees’ resources that
are productive and create value for themselves and the organization of which
they are part.
Individual Human Capital is made up of three components (Gratton,
2003): Intellectual Capital, Social Capital and Emotional Capital.
Intellectual capital refers to fundamental individual attributes such as
cognitive complexity and the capacity to learn, together with the tacit and
explicit knowledge, skills and expertise an individual builds over time. The
second component, social capital, refers to the network of relationships that
provide access to the resources members of the network possess or have access
to. The third element refers to the self-confidence based on self-esteem,
courage and resilience that individuals need in order to convert their
knowledge and relationships into effective action.
In summary, Human Capital is the key issue to manage in order to
obtain outstanding results.
This Mini-Track will be an opportunity to hear results of the latest
research in the field of Human Capital seeking, to debate methodological
issues and to discuss emerging and further areas of research.
The Human Capital Mini-Track is seeking submission
on:
- Human capital management and its measurement
- Human capital and sustainable business models
- Turning human capital into a business differentiator
- Designing HRM systems to maximize the potential of a firm’s
intellectual capital
- Defining and measuring the links between human capital and
organizational capital
- Knowledge management and competence management
- Determinants of competence in public sector
- Public sector attractiveness for experienced managers
- Human capital assignment and benchmarking
- Frameworks for conceptualising personal human capital
- Lessons learned (successes and failures)
For mini track submission details, please see the call
for papers page
|

Maria do Rosario Cabrita
|
|
|
Mini track on Linking
KM and IC to the economic growth of countries and regions and people’s
welfare 
Chair:
José M. Viedma, Technical University of Catalonia, Spain
The strength of an economy is dependent on the degree to which knowledge
is created, used and shared. Countries and regions are better off when they
promote shared knowledge from which many firms and other organizations can
benefit and when they exploit capabilities which their competitors cannot
easily match or imitate.
The knowledge economy is essentially about a bundle of intangibles embedded
in a hierarchy of networks.The vision and the ability of countries and
regions to manage their intellectual capital and master the long-term competencies building
process is key to determine the competitiveness of firms and the
socio-economic position of individuals.
The target of the EU to become the most competitive and dynamic
knowledge-based economy in the world in the context of an enlarged Europe
poses a major challenge for EU countries and regions to enhance knowledge
creation and transfer, and thus transnational collaboration and synergies
exploitation between distinct national/regional core activities.
The enduring competitive advantages in a global economy are often heavily
local, arising from concentrations of highly specialised skills and
knowledge, institutions, rivals, related businesses, sophisticated customers
and abundant financial and venture capital to nurture creativity and economic
growth. Regional (innovation) competence is ascribed to a system of
higher-order capabilities that are region specific and distinct from the
capabilities of individual firms.
Hence, to conceptualise these distinctive competencies and capabilities from
a macro perspective and to better understand how a region builds and exploits
them to leverage economic growth or how the institutional environment affects
the flows of knowledge and innovation are but a few of the research and
empirical questions in need of further investigation. Despite the efforts
that have been made in the last decade to understand knowledge-driven
processes and the knowledge elements underlying a country or region
competitive (i.e. innovative) capacity, there is still a long way ahead in
developing the appropriate frameworks and measures that allow us to
effectively tackle and manage IC and KM for wealth creation and society
welfare.
This mini track is an invitation to advance in the understanding of wealth
creation processes from a macro perspective, bridge other fields (mainly
social psychology, anthropology and geographic and institutional economics)
and start filling this “intellectual” void.
|

José M Viedma
|
|
|
A
selection of the best papers will have an opportunity to submit their work
for publication in the prestigious Electronic Journal of Knowledge
Management (ISSN:1479-4411)
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Updated 19
February 2008

|